The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
As can be seen from the pictures, the park has been dramatically transformed after the constructions of several entertainment facilities over the given period.
In 1920, visitors could enter the park from the Northern or Southern entrance on Arnold avenue or Eldon street, but now they can get in by a new entrance from the underground car park. There were a fountain located at the center of the park and a large stage for musicians on the left-hand side of the fountain, but now both have been replaced by a huge rose garden surrounded by many seats and a large amphitheater for concerts.
Looking at the first picture, the stage was midway between two rose gardens, with many seats placed next to them. There was another rose garden to the east of the Northern entry, but it has been converted into a cafe. Also, a pond for water plants on the top right-hand corner and a glasshouse on the bottom one have been flattened to make room for a children’s play area and a water feature.
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 56
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 61
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63068181818 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65042658932 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0581791214 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116195115923 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052271584221 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518113117333 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762791688529 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477632354282 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.