the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts in 2012 with the predictions for 2030
The pie charts illustrates the comparison of energy output in terms of percentage in the year 2012 and the forecast for 2030.
Overall, the productiveness from 6 sectors will not remain relatively similar over the period. Fossil fuels will be contributed the most to the energy productivity, followed by predicted other renewables and solar segment. In addition, Wind, nuclear and flexible capacity also accounted for the overall output.
Comparatively, the energy power, as it seen from the projection, will increase almost twofold, from 5,579 in 2012 to 10,569 in 2030 gigawatts. More specifically, while wind power slightly rose from 5 to 12% by 7%, the most significant increase was in solar sector, growing from 2 to 18%, that is more than nine fold.
Contrary to the growth seen in solar and wind output, the most contributed to the capacity sector of fossil fuels in 2012 will have greatly declined up to 20% for the projected year, from 64 to 44%. Following almost the same trajectory, the second segment of other renewables which made up big part of the chart is foretold to decrease at 3%, from 22 to 19 per cents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- electricity production by fuel source in France 92
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 84
- Investment in local amenities such as leisure centres is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit 66
- The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he year 2012 and the forecast for 2030. Overall, the productiveness from 6 secto...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also accounted for the overall output. Comparatively, the energy power, as it s...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2 to 18%, that is more than nine fold. Contrary to the growth seen in solar and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78080960488 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612565445026 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3240622728 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18198240013 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868674625956 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767786121975 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128529253176 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627313955025 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.