the proportion of women members of parliament in European nations from 2000 to 2012.
The line graph compares the proportion of women members of parliament in European nations from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, the percentage of female members of parliament increased in all five countries during the research period. Additionally, the UK experienced the most dramatic change over the -12-year period.
In 2000, the number of female MPs in Germany began at almost 35% and then went up gradually to exactly 35% in 2008. The figure for Italy, France and Belgium were lower at about 26%, 25%, and above 15% respectively in 2000, whereas the UK accounted for the lowest number with only about 4% at the same time. Despite some fluctuations, the proportion of women Mps in Germany continued to rise steadily, ending at over 35% in 2012.
There was a sharp increase in the figure for Italy, at almost 40% in 2012, overtaking the figure for Germany, and became the highest point of the whole line graph, compared with over 30% in France, and 23& in Belgium. Meanwhile, in Britain saw a dramatic rise to 23% which were similar to that of Belgium at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Phạm Phú Trường | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | alifdores | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | minhumm | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | Mia Nguyen | 73 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- task 1: expenditure on income groups 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 81
- task 1: relative price changes of three different groups 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79144385027 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54371261118 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8104470311 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259323216575 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142287157014 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.244682345671 0.0843802449381 290% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244902914588 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.308229271921 0.0819641961636 376% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.