The reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the Great Britain’s purposes of visiting art museums in 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the majority in the percentage of reasons why the Great Britain chose art museums as their excursion was to learn and gain knowledge over the 10-years period. In general, there was a small deviation in the proportion of museum visitor’s purposes, in oppose with the decline in the rate of people visiting museum in order to spend time with friends and family.
Looking at the charts more closely, one can see that the percentage of learning and gaining knowledge accounted for a half of the total rate of all the purposes in the figure combined during 10 years, made this group reached at 45 percent in 2000. Meanwhile, to attend a special exhibit and to spend time with friends and family had the same rate value at 12 percent in 1990, before slightly increased to 18 percent and 17 percent respectively in 10 years later. In contrast, from the second most popular reasons why the Britain visited art museum in 1990, it was steeply plunged from 27 percent to 12 percent in the first year of the 21st century. Also, people who went to art museum to buy arts increase over the course of 10 years, particularly from 1 percent to 5 percent. Eventually, as the other purposes, there was a trivial shift in the decrease by 1 percent of the Great Britain’s art museum visitors in the protracted 10 years period.
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 79
- The developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to art', 'to be'
Suggestion: to art; to be
... of reasons why the Great Britain chose art museums as their excursion was to learn...
^^^
Line 3, column 867, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivial shift in the decrease by 1 percent of the Great Britain’s art museum visito...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while, as to, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69169960474 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53833118121 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4154744993 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.375 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.625 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403055694568 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194293031975 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114266228203 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331957310234 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077708685014 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.