the information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom in 2009.
The table show the information of Governor’s expenses in five social problems involving to the domestic policy in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom in the year 2009.
Overall, it is apparent that the most expenditure was spent on health in all three countries, whilst the least spending was on the environment protection. Furthermore, all nations figured in the table used the similar amount of money on the Economic affairs sector in the same period.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that the proportion of spending which UK applied on Education stands out as the most notable concern when compared with those in the same sector in the others countries. Particularly, UK spent 6.4 percent on Education sector, whilst Germany and Italy spend under 5 percent on that. During the same year, the rate of expenditure rolled out on the Public Service by the Italy’s government officials was 8.6 percent, higher by 2 percent and 4 percent respectively above of those in Germany and the UK on the same category. Meanwhile, all three countries spent between 4 and 4.5 percent of their spending on the Economic affairs, which made a trivial disparity of their government’s charge. Presumably, 3 nations all concerned on Health problem, which is evidence by the total proportion of the government expenditure as closely 8 percent. Particularly, the UK spent 7.8 percent, followed by Italy and Germany at 7.5 percent and 7.1 percent respectively. In oppose with the Environment protection, which the total percentage of expenses of 3 countries combined were under 3 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | JayV109 | 49 | view |
- the process of plastic bottle production 73
- the proportion of profits made from the seven most viewed movie gerne in US cinemas in 1995 2000 and 2005 as a percentage of the total earnings of the US film industry for each year 75
- the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years 73
- The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002 4 73
- the proportion of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09574468085 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95951251905 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4774650577 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110481295619 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609117936786 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040080889012 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110481295619 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.