Small town Islip and plans for its developments
The map illustrates the current Islip town centre at present while the other one is about planned improvements.
Overall, it is obvious that this small town will experience a greatly new renovation. However, schools and parking lot still keep the current status without any changes.
First and foremost, to the north of the map, we can see that infrastructure will be removed and made way for significant developments. There will be bus facilities in the west, next to the shopping centre and the car parking lot. Moreover, the new housing will be located opposite to the car parking site as well as the appearance of pedestrian only road. Shops will also be conveniently situated along with pedestrian road.
Last but not least, in the south to the map, this area is going to be remained the current structure, yet a new housing will be built between the existing housing and the new parking lot. The thing that will stand out most is carriageway directing to housing area.
- Write about the following topic. In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?You should write at least 250 words. 67
- Small town Islip and plans for its developments 84
- Australian men and women do regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Agricultural development has positive impacts on human being, however, there still remains starvation in many regions all over the world. Although this could result in many issues, solutions can be taken to alleviate. 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89221556886 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68574723201 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2451730344 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890009788729 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411847610686 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663146804624 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741208709108 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713978682831 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.