Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that crime is always a very hot problem but now, the ways to find effective remedies for sinners is a more difficult issue. It is said that offenders should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. Personally, I totally strike a blow for this.
First of all, nobody in the world is perfect, sometimes they are wrong. Therefore, depending on the seriousness, they should be forgiven and given another chance to turn over a new leaf. Moreover, not every criminal is bad. Some committed felonies due to their miserable fate. For example, a teenager stole money from a store because his sister was ill and she needed to be operated on. That is why he was put into jail. Maybe, he deserves a second opportunity to alter his life.
Apart from that, when sinners are allowed to do unpaid work such as: cleaning streets, planting trees and so on, they will have a chance to experience things that they have never tried before. As a result, offenders will appreciate labor as well as regret having done wrong deeds in the past. They are likely to do good things when they are free. Everybody around can change their thoughts about these sinners. For instance, in " Healer"- a very famous Korean film and my most favourite film, there is a man who had been sentenced to seven years in prison for stealing. However, by being given chance to take part in unpaid jobs, he understood a lot of meaningful things. After being released, he works at a coffee shop and becomes a friendly and kind-hearted person. Naturally, miracles have occurred to those who used to do evils.
To sum up, I think that offenders should be given chance to do community work instead of being put behind bars. This will make great contribution to decreasing sinners in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-18 | thuybeo25092002 | 56 | view |
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 92
- Nowadays celebrities are mainly famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 93
- Some people think that children who spend alot of time reading children's story books are wasting their time which could be better used doing other more useful activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Talk about the importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 61
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is no doubt that crime is always a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, I totally strike a blow for this. First of all, nobody in the world is per...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econd opportunity to alter his life. Apart from that, when sinners are allowe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urred to those who used to do evils. To sum up, I think that offenders should...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69716088328 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49618323619 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 106.607317073 188% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630914826498 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9083523895 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.45 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.85 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306280165945 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840481589092 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15337910995 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221246736095 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11607578928 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.