Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organisation, while others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organisation, while others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Many governments across the world have been arguing over the practical ways of supporting underdeveloping countries. Some people believe that financial aids from various global institutions would be the best option. Meanwhile, others claim that different measures including actable help and skills are more required. This essay will discuss both ideas with some benefits for the public living in developing nations.

It cannot be denied that many underprivileged countries worldwide could gain immediate and quick solutions to lessen the difficulties of poverty and hunger when they could receive economic supports from international organisations such as World Vision. This is because the poor might get out of desperation in impoverishment; instead, they are able to meet their basic needs such as purchasing food and clothes in temporary.

However, in spite of many developed nations' financial help, there are still many poor countries which are suffering from such social issues continually. For these reasons, the useful and practical advice is more necessary. Many experts point out that more detailed educational programmes which deal with a variety of possible agricultural approaches and irrigation systems are more likely to bring about beneficial consequences in the developing countries in the long run. Again, as many residents learn about effective skills and techniques for their survivals, they would fight against poverty and hunger significantly.

In conclusion, it is clear that monetary support for the developing countries will be positive as a temporary action. However, to tackle concerns about widespread poverty and hunger practically, I believe that more sophisticated and diverse devices seem to be more efficient in the long run.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he public living in developing nations. It cannot be denied that many underprivi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70833333333 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99888782185 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 106.607317073 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9957215628 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167789334666 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627261427155 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483944486788 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972574446013 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623029509095 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 40.7170731707 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.