Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether altering occupations regularly or sticking to a job helps people experience a sense of satisfaction. Although I partly agree that continuing doing a profession would be beneficial in some facets, I would align myself with the notion that those changing their occupations tend to have a happier career life.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that keeping doing a job might have some auspicious effects on the career paths of workers. Firstly, sticking to a profession helps individuals to handle strenuous works effectively and easily. This is because they have accumulated hands-on experience through years of working in this job. Therefore, these workers are capable of being promoted to higher positions and gaining the trust of bosses thanks to what they have contributed to spur the development of their companies. Furthermore, those who prefer to pursue an occupation tend to feel comfortable when working in light of the fact that they have been accustomed to their working environment. Thereby, should they switch their jobs, they will struggle with adjusting to new environments, which hinders them from dedicating their endeavors to their corporations.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing me to advocate that changing professions could help worker feel satisfied. The first reason stems from the fact that this practice serves such a fundamental role in assisting workers in finding jobs offering higher salaries to them. For example, numerous people living in rural areas are inclined to give up the job as a peasant and head to metropolis like Ho Chi Minh City or Ha Noi to work in large corporations. As a result, they could earn more money, which helps them to be sufficient in financial conditions to make ends meet. Moreover, altering occupations regularly might be quite conducive for workers to acquire more real-life experience because they are able to approach to new working environments, where they are required tackle a great number of different tasks. Hence, they need to cultivate more skills in order to complete their works, which is useful for them to be proficient in distinct occupations.
In conclusion, explicitly, it cannot be denied that employees are capable of deriving the benefits of carrying on working a profession; nevertheless, I want to affirm that it is desirable for them to switch occupations frequently to experience the feeling of satisfaction. In addition, from my perspective, in order to feel happy with career paths, individuals ought to try all their best to attain remarkable success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ations. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 5.60731707317 803% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 33.7804878049 210% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 965.302439024 230% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 422.0 196.424390244 215% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27251184834 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 3.73543355544 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01177376381 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 106.607317073 219% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554502369668 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 283.868780488 239% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0400216524 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0625 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155740892987 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512925809996 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523616315258 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981044400651 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561598028048 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 40.7170731707 285% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.