Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether it is much better for museums and art exhibitions to display indigenous history and culture. Although I partly concur with this opinion, I would align myself with the notion that these sites also should exhibit traditional artefacts of other nations.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has motivated me to partly advocate the former perception. Firstly, prioritizing to show the native tradition at museums and art galleries serves such a fundamental role in preserving national conventional values. This is because when visiting these places, visitors are capable of acquiring a thorough understanding of their own nation’s custom through works displayed. Therefore, they are able to cultivate a sense of responsibility in terms of how to preserve and promote these orthodox values. Furthermore, placing more emphasis on exhibiting the history and culture of their own nation could spur the patriotism in local inhabitants. For example, when visiting Vietnamese History Museum, situated in Ho Chi Minh City, residents can gain a deeper insight into milestones like wars or historic victories that this nation underwent. It can lead to the fact that they can be more accountable in protecting Vietnam from being invaded.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing me to concede that cultural works of other nations ought to be exhibited at local museums and art galleries. The first reason stems from the fact that this practice can assist local citizens in broadening their minds with international traditions. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that masterpieces, created by some prestigious artists like Da Vanci or Van Gogh, are exposed in Vietnamese Museum, creating a conductive environment for art students to gain in-depth knowledge relating to classical styles in Europe. Moreover, this practice could connect all nations in the world together owing to the fact that knowing other countries’ traditions can facilitate mutual understanding and sympathy among nations. As a result, countries are able to fortify their cooperation with others.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that devoting focus to exhibiting national history and culture at art rooms and museums can give rise to a great number of auspicious repercussions; nevertheless, I want to assert that it is necessary for these sites to take the customs of other countries into their account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | doquytuan | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes Instead they get news about the world from the Internet Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- The three pie charts below show the total spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 56
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...nvaded. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications convincing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43298969072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03587680678 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4915917443 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.533333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217203248991 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707474540791 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489144290806 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132365121904 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170588649253 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.