Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In my opinion, the two means of communication are valuable in different situations. So, it is not true to say one of them is more powerful than the other one and their value depends on where we use them. Therefore, I completely disagree with the statement.
Firstly, spoken communication is changeable and parties can claim about precedent sentences because not only would be oral communication ambiguous and two-sided but also people may have wrong perception from speaking agreement. Therefore, all agreement and legislation are written by the legislator to avoid vague understanding. Additionally, intonation and voice affect the aim of sentences. For example, you can mime one sentence with different intense to show different meanings and this is the other way you may perceive wrong or other meaning.
Secondly, spoken and written communication complements each other and they are not necessarily have superiority. We use various means of communication in accordance with the situation and importance of truly delivering message. Take friendly communication as an example. It is much easier to speak with friends and show our love and kindness through oral communication than writing the letter with exactly the same effect. However, in the crucial position like the government, every words and rules must be written and documented for further references and be assured the last longer.
In conclusion, I disagree the superiority of spoken communication over written one and I believe they both have various usages which are help us to deliver our massage better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-18 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | Elahe13 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Đỗ Thanh Hà | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | kashyap sahil | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Karla | 80 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...usages which are help us to deliver our massage better.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08827545646 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2649458651 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283104088378 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913843505129 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532603926311 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166934911828 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241316563946 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...usages which are help us to deliver our massage better.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08827545646 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2649458651 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283104088378 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913843505129 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532603926311 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166934911828 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241316563946 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.