Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions. To what extent do you agree?
For the last few years, sports especially extreme sports have grown in popularity throughout the world. While some people believe that these kinds of sports are too dangerous to be watched on TV or beheld in international competitions, others totally disagree with it. Personally, I think that each opinion has its reasons.
To commence with, it is said that extreme sports should be prohibited due to its high risk of injury and death. For instance, in boxing, boxers often take powerful blows to knock out his opponent and win. However, it also means that they may die or be injured anytime. Lots of fighters after a match are dead or disabled. Besides, watching too much dangerous sport programs will affect badly children and teenagers. They will tend to imitate those violent behaviours which can lead to unexpected incidents.
On the flip side, other have thoughts that are totally go against the above statement. The main reason is simply the money.. According to The Wall Street Journal ( WSJ) - a famous American newspaper, the more violent the sport is, the more money will be earned, Specifically, the price of a ticket to see a Muay Thai match is three times as high as that one of a concert ticket. The salary of fighters is beyond the expectations. A fight is able to help them get millions of dollars. Because of the immediate benefits, despite knowing the result of taking such extreme sports, many people are still willing to try.
To sum up, banning sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts is a controversial problem. However, I think that they are should be prohibited since I can see the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-11 | thuybeo25092002 | 61 | view |
- Homework is a part of school life Many people feel that giving homework daily to school children works well for them while some feel it is an unnecessary burden on them What do you think about it Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp 82
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Ensuring that children have regular physical exercise should be the responsibility of parents and therefore schools should not waste valuable school time having sports lessons as part of the curriculum. To what extent do you agree? 78
- Talk about the importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...e, other have thoughts that are totally go against the above statement. The main r...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ent. The main reason is simply the money.. According to The Wall Street Journal W...
^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y.. According to The Wall Street Journal WSJ - a famous American newspaper, the m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93971631206 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6696153999 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 106.607317073 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641843971631 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1430479679 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9411764706 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238584955831 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604446494316 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775754366961 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156477169697 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885065358397 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.