Source of complaints and average time from investigation data to final action.
The pie chart elucidates the source of complaints in 7 aspects and the figure illustrates the average time from investigation data to final action from 2000 to 2004. At first glance, it is evident that in comparing to other aspects, public has become the most noticeable source and overall, it is able to be seen that the investigation data’s average time experienced a palpitation over the whole period.
To begin with, there was a dramatic range in between source of complaint in the pie chart in which public has higher rate among other aspects where it contributed around 63%. Moreover, government agencies, out of state and insurance companies have a lower rate compared to public in which all of them have 11 in 100, one-tenths and 8% respectively. However, the other three groups, which are Bank employees, others and media, have a slight rate which is approximately at just beneath four in a hundred.
In accordance with the second graph, there was a significant upsurge for average time from investigation data to final action in between 2000, which was at just under 6, and 2001, which made up at just beyond 6. Nonetheless, over the following 3 years, it witnessed a gradual oscillation and finished at well over 4 in 2004.
- Line graph : car exports in three regions from 2013 to 2017. 78
- Bar Chart : Employment rates, by country, 1995 – 2005. 78
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorernations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility forhelping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 73
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world.- What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem?- What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90521327014 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86197853562 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.6797421007 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.857142857 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346785849946 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168025099788 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.213015175915 0.0843802449381 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263849970084 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210635632178 0.0819641961636 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.