Students are becoming more and more reliant on the Internet. While the Internet is convenient, it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted.
How far do you agree with this statement?
In today’s modern world, the Internet is more likely to be used widely in a part of the world, especially in the education system. It is a common belief that it is beneficial for teaching and learning due to its convenience. However it is argued that the Internet is negative for students in many aspects. While I accept the Internet should be limited for several reasons, I side with the idea that it is still a valuable tool for pupils.
On the one hand, there are a handful of reasons why the Internet has some negative aspects. First of all, websites on the Internet are very complex. In other words, it could contain information that is not incorrect or not suitable for pupils. So, students need to know how to check the material or evaluate the information they find on the Internet. Secondly, some students simply copy amounts of material for their studies without understanding. In consequence, they will not learn it fully and not deeply understand the lessons.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the Internet plays a vital role in school and in everyday life and should not be restricted. Firstly, if students learn how to use the Internet correctly, they can use it for keeping in touch with friends and family or social networking. Secondly, students need the Internet for research in school or university. In other words, they can use the Internet to search for the most up-to-date news or information rather than in books. Last but not least, the covid 19 pandemic has contributed to the use of the Internet for education. In order to continue normal school during lockdowns, students need to use the Internet to pursue their studies such as Zoom or Google Meetings.
To sum up, while it is apparent that the Internet has many disadvantages in school, however, the Internet is a double-edged sword. I believe if teachers and schools teach students how to use the Internet in the right ways, they are more likely to become more dynamic and willing to study in class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ng and learning due to its convenience. However it is argued that the Internet is negat...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... pupils. On the one hand, there are a handful of reasons why the Internet has some ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudies such as Zoom or Google Meetings. To sum up, while it is apparent that the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, first of all, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 965.302439024 171% => OK
No of words: 348.0 196.424390244 177% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74712643678 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65897001646 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479885057471 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 283.868780488 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.431637742 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384768873162 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124651682493 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681028383672 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254456490219 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737907795721 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.