The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and
2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and
the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the details of police budget in a specific area of Britain from 2017 to 2018. The table compares the sources of police budget in the two years period and the pie chart compares where the budget spent on both in 2017 and 2018.
It is noticeable that the total budget of police had an increase in every aspect of the sources. The chart shows the percentage of budget spent had changed in salaries and technology, but the expense of buildings and transport stayed at a stable rate.
The total budget of police in 2017 was 304.7 million, consisted of 175.5 million from national government, 91.2 million from local taxes and 38 million from other sources. In both three sources, the level of budget increased in 2018. National government spent more 2.3 million on police and the fund from other sources also rose up to 38.5 million. Local taxes provided the highest rise by 11.1 million in 2018.
It could be seen in the pie chart that the expenditure of buildings and transport stayed at 17% of the whole expense in both 2017 and 2018. Salary expense decreased in 2018 with 69%, lower than 2017 by 6%. Meanwhile, police department spend more bedget on technology, and its proportion rose form 8% to 14% in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72350230415 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37120844483 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493087557604 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7839346895 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240388067501 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956118442513 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644338487137 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154628688668 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802444222144 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72350230415 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37120844483 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493087557604 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7839346895 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240388067501 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956118442513 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644338487137 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154628688668 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802444222144 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.