The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed

Essay topics:

The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came
from and the charts show how it was distributed.

The given table illustrates the data on the police budget and the two pie charts provide the distribution of the quantity of money in one area of Britain between 2017 and 2018. Generally speaking, all three different sources experienced an upward trend while the expenditures spent on salaries was always the highest in both two years.

Take a closer look at the statistical account, it can be clearly seen that the “ National Government “ was 175.5 million pounds - the highest amount of money in 2017. Then, after one year, this source increased 2.3 million pounds more than in the past. The “ Local Taxes “ also had a significant change, from 91.2 million pounds to 102.3 million pounds while other sources just rosed a small number of expenses in the budget.

On the other hand, there was a slight decline in officers and staff' salaries while technology grew from a tiny fraction to 14%, 6% increased. In addition, buildings and transport remained stable at a small portion from 2017 to 2018.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 84 view
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-03-09 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-12 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user phanky :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ccount, it can be clearly seen that the “ National Government “ was 175.5 million...
^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...rly seen that the “ National Government “ was 175.5 million pounds - the highest ...
^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...llion pounds more than in the past. The “ Local Taxes “ also had a significant ch...
^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...ore than in the past. The “ Local Taxes “ also had a significant change, from 91....
^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...n pounds while other sources just rosed a small number of expenses in the budget. On the other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48918942995 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645348837209 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4602103501 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21389146467 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967581373127 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119542786906 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14053585842 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855604184825 0.0819641961636 104% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.