The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graphs illustrate the police budget for two years 2017 and 2018 in one specific area in Britain. The table gives information about the sources of money, and the two chart depict the distribution of the money. Overall, it can be seen that there are three main sources of the budget, likewise the amount of money was spent on three fields.
To begin with, the police funds have three sources, and the total of money that was collected in 2018 was the highest and reached 318.6m while in 2017 was 304.7m. The amount of money that came from national authorities was 175.5m in 2017, but in 2018 had become 177.8m. Likewise, the domestic taxes provided 91.2m in 2017, and 102.3m in 2018. The other sources such as grants were the lowest in both 2017 and 2018 at 38m and 38.5m respectively.
Moreover, the amount of money collected by those sources was distributed to three sectors. In 2017, %75 of the funds went to police officers and employees incomes while in 2018 it had decreased to %69. However, they spent %8 on technology in 2017, but in 2018 it almost doubled to %14. The money that was allocated for buildings and transports in two years had not changed and remained at %17.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets other people prefer to do their food shopping online Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the changes in the ownership of households electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will also negatively affect nature What 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63679245283 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32391160498 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6011043393 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3636363636 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310200363996 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117210474842 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783830004609 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218490772909 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901512330226 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.