It is true that riding a bicycle is a better way to protect the environment than using other types of vehicles, but not many people in the world prefer this means of transport. There are a number of reasons behind this view and several solutions should be adopted to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why the uncommon use of the bicycle in some parts of the world. Firstly, society is more and more modern and developed, everyone is very busier, they will give priority to fast transport to save time instead of cycling. For example, with a distance of 5 kilometers, while a motorbike or car only takes about 10 to 15 minutes to complete, the bicycles can take twice as much time as those. Furthermore, cycling is more physically demanding than riding a motorbike or car, especially on a hot and sunny day or when they have to travel a long distance. This tends to discourage people from choosing this method.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. The first solution would be to improve transport infrastructure by building more lanes to serve the only cyclists, which would make traveling by bicycle much faster. A second measure would be the government should regularly launch movements and campaigns to enhance citizens’ awareness of the harmful effects of motorbikes and cars on the environment. This could encourage people to cycle more often.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons why cycling is becoming less common in today’s world, and steps need to be taken to tackle this problem.
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 78
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be effected on society 89
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity 73
- the table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the Uk in 2002 93
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68792786128 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3346982566 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.083333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133353829058 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482287810887 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420440412981 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798942185578 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137276429689 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.