The table and pie charts show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table and the pie charts demonstrate the proportion of investigation students in universities of Australia in 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the total number of research students significantly increased over period of 9 years. Besides, the percentage of local students who did experiments was far higher than that number of foreign students in both years.
In 2001, there were 38849 students conducted investigation in Australian universities and 5192 of these from international which accounted for 13%. 2010 witnessed a significant growth of total research students to 54081 and a doubling the percentage of overseas students to 27%. In contrast, the figure of local students considerably dropped from 87% in 2001 to 73% in 2010.
In the meantime, the ratios of local male and female performed experiments in 2001 were equal of 43%. This proportion of foreign students however were higher in male and both stood at a lower level of 9% and 4%, respectively. Along with the general trend, the percentage of international research male and female dramatically rose up to 12% and 15% in 2010. This resulted to the decline of local male and female rates to 12% and 15%, respectively.
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over 4 different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 74
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups, UK 1990 11
- Marriages in America 73
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19791666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07797958624 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9589029218 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228855637907 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100482816009 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081374267726 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171064481578 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939898959428 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.