The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities.
Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table indicates actual and estimated figures for citizens in three various cities, namely Sao Paulo, Jakarta and Shanghai in the years 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that the number of actual population in 1990 was lower than the number of that in 2000 in the two cities Sao Paulo and Jakarta. The figures for predicted citizens in 2000 were much higher than the figures for citizens in fact in all three cities shown.
To begin with, actual population in Sao Paulo and Jakarta in 1990 was 15 million people and 9.5 million people respectively, they were lower than actual population in 2000 in these two cities. While, the figure for actual population in Shanghai in 1990 was 13.5 million people, it was higher than the figure for actual population in 2000, with only 12.5 million people.
In 2000, the number of predicted citizens in Sao Paulo was the highest, with 24 million people, but, in fact, Sao Paulo only had 18 million people. The figures for estimated citizens in Jakarta and Shanghai were much higher than the figures for citizens in fact, 14 and 17 million people compared to 11.5 and 12.5 million people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | hieu19101995 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-24 | Qui | 84 | view |
- Percentage of car ownership in Great Britain according to household 84
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 79
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the problems if people try to achieve this balance How to overcome these problems 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24547067611 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.378787878788 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.6314208351 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184432116806 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11512713701 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559470321599 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143246304833 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371901103799 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.