The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below.
The table illustrates how people of different ages ranging from teens to the elderly spend their spare time on a variety of pastimes per year.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, three of the most common leisure pursuits of Someland’s citizens were watching TV and videos, interacting with a maximum of four individuals and founding group exercise or sport. On the other hand, the other recreational activities were less popular.
People’s favorite hobby was watching TV/ videos: the table showed that teenagers invested 1,200 hours a year in doing this while the number of those of 70-years-old was 1,100; even people who least favored watching spent at least 400 hours on it. Meanwhile, the amount of time on socializing with four people or less ranged from 150 to 300 hours. This kind of recreation was the most enjoyed for 30-years-old. While the elderly after turning 60 didn’t do exercise in group at all, teenagers and youngsters liked this activity so much that it devoured 450 and 350 hours of their free time per year respectively.
Communication with at least four people was trendy with the youth when its number reached 350 hours. In the two next sectors, however, the number plummeted significantly to 50 and plateaued at 25 for the rest of activities. Individual exercise, on the other hand, was the most common with 30-40- years-old, their spent hours were 200. Cinema was the least time-spent hobby when teenagers contributed 100 hours; yet, the other did not account for above those.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-27 | stanie calitex | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | Minyuu_Ivy | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | Minyuu_Ivy | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | BETO2020 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | PRAMODH k | 78 | view |
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation syst 89
- Should we discourage people to use cars 84
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 73
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given Write at least 150 words
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report f 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'who the least'.
Suggestion: who the least
... of 70-years-old was 1,100; even people who least favored watching spent at least 400 hou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...time on socializing with four people or less ranged from 150 to 300 hours. This kind...
^^^^
Line 8, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other did not account for above those.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, at least, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03162055336 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66268834667 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3081015875 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181017908044 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700874002789 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443642395467 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114159399057 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057012140312 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'who the least'.
Suggestion: who the least
... of 70-years-old was 1,100; even people who least favored watching spent at least 400 hou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...time on socializing with four people or less ranged from 150 to 300 hours. This kind...
^^^^
Line 8, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other did not account for above those.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, at least, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03162055336 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66268834667 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3081015875 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.727272727 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181017908044 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700874002789 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443642395467 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114159399057 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057012140312 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.