The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012

The table shows the number of Trillion Watt Hours (TWh) produced by five different renewable energy sources in the four years from 2009 to 2012.

Overall, the production from five renewable energy sources has increased over the time period, but Hydraulic energy produced the more TWh than all the other renewable energy sources.

The highest number of world electricity production was provided by Hydraulic energy source that was in average almost 3500 TWh over the given period. In contrast, Solar energy generally provided the smallest number of TWh. However, the amount of world electiricity supplied by Geoterman energy in 2012 was below the number of electricity production from Solar energy.

In 2009, the number of wind and bio-mass energy produced was a nearly similar, and these figures accounted for 276.4 and 246.8 TWh, respectively. Nevertheless, Wind energy production showed gradually increase, and it reached nearly double the amount in 2012. Moreover, the electricity production from Bio-mass sources had also consistently increase.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (26 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...aulic energy produced the more TWh than all of the other renewable energy sources. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...ber of world electricity production was provide by Hydraulic energy source that was in ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56790123457 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68994186323 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.340481306 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257259186345 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133210331949 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721970077035 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173016302639 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690274705947 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.