The line graph illustrates information on the percentage of British citizens in different age groups donating money to a charity in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the age group 36 to 50 was the highest donator in 1990, while the dominant charity had been done by British people in the aged over 50 in 2010.
In 1990, nearly 16 percentage of British between 18 and 25 donated money to a charity and this figure was the lowest. Furthermore, there was an increasing percentage in the proportion of British citizens giving money, and it hit the peak at people who aged 36 to 50 and this ratio reached nearly above 40. In contrast, the percentage of Britishers giving money to charity gradually decreased. These percentages showed 35% for those aged 51 to 65 and 33% over 65 aged.
On the other hand, there was a significant decline in the British people who donated money in 2010. The highest level of donation was gained from 51 to 65 aged group and this rate experienced just below 40%. Moreover, the aged group over 65 had the second highest donation's number in the same year. However, the fewer younger donated to charity. This figure decreased from 16% to 6%, and was the highest level of decreasing. In addition, the donation of money had a similar trend between 26-35 and 36-50 aged group. These donation figures dropped 25% and 35%, respectively.
- The diagram below gives the information about the Hawaiian island chain in the centre of the Pacific Ocean.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 61
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment.Discuss both these views 73
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 78
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 78
- The diagram shows the process of making recycled paper from old newspaper. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76170212766 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57014231269 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2142821592 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0769230769 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245835758785 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102543122709 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872761369725 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190972603695 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774328626924 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.