Nowadays, digital technology is one of the most important improvement in most countries. It has changed the way people access information because mobile phone and the internet include most of informations that people need. Therefore, some people believe that these tools can be used effectively for some different situation such as finding a job in providing free by government, but some others argue against. This essay will discuss both arguments.
First of all, the number of unemployement in some countries gradually increase every year, because job areas are not enough for population and also people do not know which qualification is require for occupations. Moreover, buying a mobile phone and the internet connection require a certain budget, but unemployee people cannot afford it. For these reasons, providing free mobile phone and the internet connection can be effective to help them search job ads.
On the other hand, while these type of digital tools provide easy, cheap and convenient information, they include many of fake and illegal jobs, and it can cause many things to endanger people's safety. Therefore, unlimited and free uses of mobile phone and the internet can be negative impact on the government. Instead of this, governmet can establish some specific organizations can apply for free to find a job, like İŞ-KUR in Turkey. These type of organizations can leads people safely to find job, and they can also inform about the qualifications required for occupation.
In conclusion, government should not spend on money to provide technological tools. Spending the government's money for establish finding a job occupations organizations could be better.
- The world would be a happier place if we all enjoyed our work To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years. What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 78
- Some people choose to eat no fish or meat. They believe that this is not better for your own health but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss these view and give your own opinion. 78
- The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012 83
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project 57
In the 4.0 era with…
In the 4.0 era with available applications like now, I think that is normal
Great experiences watching anime movies
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the informations') or simply say ''most informations''.
Suggestion: most of the informations; most informations
...e mobile phone and the internet include most of informations that people need. Therefore, some peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nformations that people need. Therefore, some people believe that these tools can...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...ople do not know which qualification is require for occupations. Moreover, buying a mob...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ovide technological tools. Spending the governments money for establish finding a job occup...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40151515152 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91971505396 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2812308734 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310663032022 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113868590668 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702408777995 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193258390129 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571444623496 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.