The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the yearly expenditure of university students between 3 countries in separating to 6 categories, namely different living costs, accommodation, food, books, leisure, and other expense.
Overall, it can be seen that Country C living expenses are less than students’ countries A and B. In addition, they are also giving more priority to accommodation and food.
As can be noticed that the need for housing is seemingly preferred in all students in 3 nations, with Country A spent 5000$ annually which contained at 45% for hiring accommodation. Meanwhile, Country B has spent 4500$ yearly with accommodation accounted for 35%. Eventually, the total spending for all people who are lives in Country C with its figures at 1500$ and students is willing used to 30% in the category of accommodation.
On the other hand, food is second-ranked to almost all students, with Country C is more than a third went on food, as opposed to Country A and B, with the proportion of 22% and 28%, respectively. Focusing on leisure activities in three nations have a considerable fluctuate with the data of Country B to 23%, Country A to 22% and Country C to 12%. In addition, Books are less likely to purchase which is shown that Country C is reached a peak at 21% when it compared to Country A and B, the figures have a little fraction of 3% and 9%. Eventually, miscellaneous expenses accounted for 8%, 5%, 1% in Country A, B and C.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | TranMinhDuc | 72 | view |
- the process below shows how to make dough for a pizza 78
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The diagrams show how the layout of a school library changed 72
- The diagram below illustrates how a simple water filter is constructed and how it functions to produce clean drinking water Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagram below 76
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore priority to accommodation and food. As can be noticed that the need for hous...
^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$5000'.
Suggestion: $5000
...ents in 3 nations, with Country A spent 5000$ annually which contained at 45% for hir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$4500'.
Suggestion: $4500
...odation. Meanwhile, Country B has spent 4500$ yearly with accommodation accounted for...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ally, the total spending for all people who are lives in Country C with its figures at ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1500'.
Suggestion: $1500
... lives in Country C with its figures at 1500$ and students is willing used to 30% in ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed for 8%, 5%, 1% in Country A, B and C.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80241935484 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06280724849 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536290322581 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5035352273 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146539432649 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661310867217 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304651060032 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100486545079 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165027337338 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.