The two pie charts show the percentage of pollutants entering a particular part of the ocean in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two pie charts show the percentage of pollutants entering a particular part of the ocean in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts compare how much pollutants went into a specific section of the ocean from 1997 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a considerable upward in the sort of domestic sewage and offshore oil, otherwise, the left of other pollutants has been gone down during the 10 years.
As can be clearly noticed that pollutants from air make up the highest portion at 30 per cent in 1997, when it compared in 2007, is a slight declined to 29%. Nevertheless, domestic sewage has second-ranked with its account for 18%, and then it was gradual soar to 29 per cent, similar to the percentage of pollutants from the air in 2007. In addition, 11 per cent of pollution was from offshore oil, which was about three-times figures a decade ago.
By contrast, marine is the third most relevant with its figure at 22% in 1997, then it saw a plumed to 17% in 2007. at 22% in 1997, then it saw a plumed to 17% in 2007. Strikingly, the pollutants from litter have a little fraction of 4%, after there was no litter part of the ocean. To farm waste and industrial waste also have been a considerable downward to 2% and 9%, respectively between 1997 to 2007.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (16 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The pie charts compare how much pollutants went into a specific section...
^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
..., then it saw a plumed to 17% in 2007. at 22% in 1997, then it saw a plumed to 17...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, in addition, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46226415094 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60060991833 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.010492451 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 76.5299724578 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 16.8248392259 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 4.34317383033 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182077859892 0.216113520407 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08371681686 0.0766984524023 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516136842021 0.0603063233224 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117291337134 0.12726935374 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675003048612 0.0580467560999 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 70.7449484536 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 8.71597938144 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.