The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features, and make comprasions where relevant.
The table illustrates the average distance in miles travel per person per year in eight distinct modes of travel in 1985 and 2000. It is obvious that the car has most distance among other modes and the Taxi has the lowest in addition the total number of distances in 1985 was higher than 2000.
As can be seen, the Walking, Bicycle, and local bus reduced in 2000 ordered by 18, 10, and 47 numbers and other remined groups increased in 2000. The most important group that increased significantly was car by about 1700 miles. Among of modes Taxi, Train, Long distance bus, and car modes ordered rise up approximately 29, 75, 70, and 1700 miles. The taxi and bicycle used under 100 miles in 1985 and 2000 that meant people did not like to use these modes of travel. By contrast the statistics showed people of society have a good tendency to use Car mode for traveling.
As a result, the total average distance in miles by 2000 raised around 2000 miles while some groups declined and some else went up.
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The most important aim of science should to be improve people s lives To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54696132597 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20899150712 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0095089039 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.875 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145389355368 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688136141724 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428296496913 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100540337697 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440875911913 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.