The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two maps compare today's outline of a town centre and its planned development. Overall, almost every part of the site will be changed and circled by a dual carriageway.
Firstly, a way dedicated merely to pedestrians will replace the main road and the stores on the north side of the main road will be modified into a bus station, a shopping centre, a car park, and a new housing. On the other hand, there are several buildings whose locations will remain unchanged like the shops on the south part of the main road, the school, and the park.
Moreover, the residencies will have minor alterations in terms of location. The first one which is currently located exactly in the south area of the shops will be moved to the southwest of the area and will align with the newly built housing facility which will be in the western region of the park, while the second one will be relocated to the east and precisely on the south side of the carriageway.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5730994152 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45977175158 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.8033589687 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505270780983 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368514623883 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553199062839 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474625045326 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415758331928 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.