the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

The table illustrates the finance management on ordinary life in five separated countries in 2002.

Overall, the table is divided into three groups which are the bodybuilding need (food, drinks, and tobacco), the outlook ( clothes, footwear ) and mental demand (education, leisure). Among the three sides, the necessity of energy for daily life takes the most vital part, especially in Turkey. The table gradually decreases in order of the three mentioned.

Regarding mineral, vitamins or anything essential for the living body, which are made by absorption, averagely takes about one-fifth of costumers' outcome through five sections, Ireland for 28.91%, Italy for 16.36%, Spain for 18.80%, Sweden for 15.77% and Turkey for 32.14%. On the other hand, there is less interest in the others : gaining knowledge and entertainment, and outfits.

In Ireland, Spain and Turkey, the proportion of clothes and shoes are nearly similar ( 6.43% to 6.51% and 6.63%), Italy is higher, but in Sweden, it is a bit lower than the others. Moreover, the percentage of the remaining group is just more or less about 1% compared to each other, except for Italy and Sweden (3.20% and 3.22%).

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d food, drinks, and tobacco, the outlook clothes, footwear and mental demand edu...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tobacco, the outlook clothes, footwear and mental demand education, leisure. Am...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of clothes and shoes are nearly similar 6.43% to 6.51% and 6.63%, Italy is highe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, except for, more or less, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27807486631 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54859404339 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657754010695 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4303467351 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840280810714 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043831087165 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613791728731 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722884663187 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729022895487 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.