Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

As the consumption of the modern world is on its way of growing, dumps from homes have become too many to give enough care. Some people claim that goverment legalize the requirement of fully recycling trash from every home. However, before making such a decision, the authorities should educate their civilians through the media.

First of all, if the government immediately made it legal for vitalness of recycling without preparaion, it would cause a lot of conflicts from the citizens. The punishment will be unfair for those who do not have much knowledge about recycling and it may have some addition of taxes while government needs investment for building observe department and the recycling system. On the contrary, prior to make the new law, the government should transmit their message through the mass media such as Facebook, TV or newspaper to make families aware of the severe consequence of the disposed worthless material they used. For those who keep the same way of managing the trash, the authority ought to send a warning and fine them on condition that they ignore the warning.

With the developing science and technology, homes will be able to handle reprocessing on their own. Nowadays, scientists have invented some robots which are in capable of distributing several kinds of garbage and innovate into new products, but those are still expensive. Nevertheless, in couples of years, inventions of cheap robots will be available for homes.

To sum up, the idea of making recycling a legal reqiurement is inappropriately impractical mostly because of the persistance from homes and the magical evolution of modern technology.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, such as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20224719101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83199566909 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621722846442 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3347487206 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.272727273 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309555729879 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104427346005 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691183204507 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171195296235 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812210827437 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.