The table represent data collected from five countries about money expenditures in 3 differents categories (Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear, Leisure/Education). This information was collected in 2002 and the units are in percentage.
Overall, all countries show a similar behaviour, the mayorn expenditure goes to "Food/Drink/Tobacco" with some variations on each country, the smaller one is on the category of Leisure and Education with a much lesser percentage than in Food/Drink/Tobacco between both categories it is clothing and Footwear wich is slightly lesser more than Leisure and Education.
The countrie with more expenditure in food is Turkey with a 32,14% at the same time is the country wich more spent in Leisure and Education (4,35%) is worth mentioning that both categories does not have relationship, Sweden exeplified this affirmation, is the country wich less spent in food (15,77%) but have the highest expenditure in Leisure and Education (3,22%). In ascendent order based in Food expenses are Sweden 15,77%, Spain 18,8%, Italy 16,36%, Ireland 28,8% and Turkey with 32,14%. Meanwhile in Leisure and Education (same order) Spain 1,98%, Ireland 2,21%, Italy 3,28%, Sweden 3,22% and Turkey 4,35%.
On the other hand, Clothing and Footwear keep his place in the middle of the other two categories with a slightly inclination spend less, almost all five countries have a percentage that wave between 5% and 7%,the only exception is Italy with a 9% of expenditure, second place goes for Turkey 6,63%, third Spain with 6,51%, fourth is Ireland 6,43% and the last one is Sweden with 5,4%.
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries
- The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked 79
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table represent data collected from ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...002 and the units are in percentage. Overall, all countries show a similar be...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ser more than Leisure and Education. The countrie with more expenditure in fo...
^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
..., Ireland 28,8% and Turkey with 32,14%. Meanwhile in Leisure and Education same order Spa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,28%, Sweden 3,22% and Turkey 4,35%. On the other hand, Clothing and Footwear...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('inclination') instead of another adjective.
...middle of the other two categories with a slightly inclination spend less, almost all five countries h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve countries have a percentage that wave between 5% and 7%,the only exception is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45019920319 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49156764027 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533864541833 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 128.461063743 43.030603864 299% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.428571429 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8571428571 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108143479 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650105972159 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743478164744 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900089046455 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976448625104 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.