The table below gives information about the economic value of international students in US in 2005, 2010 and 2015. The bar graph shows change in the number of international students from three countries in two of those years.
The table shows the data about contributing of oversea students into the economy in US from 2005 to 2015, and the bar graph compares the amount of international students from China, India and South Korea in the years 2005 and 2015,
As an overview, international student’s economic contribution increased significantly from 2005 to 2015, there was a considerable change in the amount of students from three countries to US, especially China.
According to the table, the amount jumped from 10,1 billion dollars in 2005 to 15,6 billion dollars over the 5-year periods. Then, rate of growth of economy in US based on abroad students rose more significantly in the last 5 years of this period, it climbed by 20 billion dollars. In the bar chart, we can see clearly that the number of students from three countries was lower than 100 thousands, the highest one was India and lowest was China in 2005. Come to 2015, the amount of Chinese and Indian students increased rapidly with over 350 thousands Chinese students and over 200 thousands Indian students, this amount was higher three times compared to Korea.
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper, will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- the charts below show the information about land use in four countries 78
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- it is important to be concerned about international events even if those events have no direct impact on our lives 78
- The table below gives information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany Italy and the United Kingdom in 2009 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01075268817 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69680870654 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.085141168 43.030603864 270% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.4 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365467025991 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168433693863 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158015477386 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315190315959 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101616557702 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.2329268293 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.