The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.
The table depicts about the dominant five small companies in Britain as per the survey of staff undertaken by a national newspaper in order to determine which company is the most appropriate to work for.
Overall, with the exception of 'male:female ratio' and 'staff in high income bracket', fifth company surpasses considerably its counterparts in the rest three positions.
In terms of staff numbers, with 190, the fifth company heads the list, while the first company stands at 56, which is about three times much less than 5th company. Other three companies have approximately 75 staffs. Tur...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 77 | view |
| 2017-12-13 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 86 | view |
| 2016-11-17 | Dinara | 63 | view |
| 2015-07-06 | rteodora | 97 | view |
- The Internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize. 86
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 56
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profitmakingcompanies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages? 96
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
wrong summary:
Overall, with the exception of 'male:female ratio' and 'staff in high income bracket', fifth company surpasses considerably its counterparts in the rest three positions.
better one:
Overall, those companies have a number of staff between 50 and 200, with both male and female employees at a different ratio, and also most of them are under 35s and almost none over 55s.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 212 200
No. of Characters: 975 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.599 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.5 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.395 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.424 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.654 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...t appropriate to work for. Overall, with the exception of male:female ratio and staff in high inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'genders'' or 'gender's'?
Suggestion: genders'; gender's
...approximately 75 staffs. Turning to the genders ratio, 2nd and 5th companies have almos...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54509476898 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598086124402 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0744091838 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291945653481 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120606824755 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137678282283 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208954381946 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163103855039 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.