The given table depicts the comparison between two schools, which had different problems suffered by learners, over 10-year period, starting from 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that more students of school A had issues on their academic than thoses in school B. It is also clear that the majorities found it hard to concentrate on lessons in 2005, that position was converted to handwriting cases in 2015.
Looking at the table, in 2005, although 40% of students of school A could not stay focus on study, that number decreased to only 18%, with the stable data of that sector had recorded for school B. There was a same numbers of A's children suffered from ideas and listening problems in both years, 35% and 20% respectively. In contrast, just 11% to 15% of pupils learnt in school B had these issues.
Regarding to the table, it is noticeable that the figure of handwriting contributed for 28% and 7% over 10 years without any changes, in school A and B accordingly. Nevertheless, it is calculated a 5% decline in spelling of A, it was a 5% increase in B. Moreover, there was around one-fifth of A's undergraduated had difficulties on reading section, under 10% of that is distributed for B's. The remaining 42% is allocated for "following instrcutions" sector, making it the largest number of A's proportion in particular, and the whole table in general.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, in contrast, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87606837607 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04371022978 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5389809555 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170546882864 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643555599148 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401866857491 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105347328897 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412039577627 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.