The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

The given table compares the percentage of children with different educational struggles in schools A and B in 2 distinguished years.
It is noticeable from the table that school A had more students with educational trouble than school B in both years. However, while school A had a decrease in the percentage of most of the problems, school B saw an overall rise in the incidence of struggling pupils between 2005 and 2015.
In 2005, 22% and 24% of students in school A found it difficult in reading and handwriting, respectively. These figures for school B were significantly less, 8% and 7%. There 30-40% of children in school A had trouble with spelling, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, concentration in lessons, and following instructions while only 5-15% of students in school B had the same problems in the year 2005.
The proportion of students who had trouble in 7 categories in 2015 witnessed a less minimal difference between schools A and B in 2005. In school A, apart from the percentage of areas in reading ability and handwriting remained relatively stable at 23% and 28%, the rest of the figures had a dramatic decrease. There were 25%, 20%, 21%, 18%, and 18% of children having problems with spelling, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, concentration in lessons, and following instructions, respectively. On the other hand, from 2005 to 2015, school B experienced a double proportion of students who could not spell and follow instructions easily. Besides, almost the rest of the figures for school B saw a slight rise. The incidence of the students struggling in reading, handwriting, listening, verbal expression of ideas, and concentrating in lessons were 9%, 7%, 12%, 15%, and 15%, respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, apart from, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1013986014 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11950235276 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468531468531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8037119322 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208748251794 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904002543395 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463635763409 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154306922753 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180583263862 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.