The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

The table compares two primary schools in terms
of the proportions of their pupils who
experienced seven different educational
problems in the years 2005 and 2015.
It is noticeable that school A had a higher
proportions of children with all seven educational
difficulties in both years. However, while school
A managed to reduce the incidence of most of
the problems between 2005 and 2015, school B
saw an overall rise in the percentage of children
who were struggling.
In 2005, 42% of school Aǯs pupils found it difficult
to follow instructions, whereas only 6% of pupils
in school B experienced this problem. Similarly,
between 30 and 40 percent of children attending
school A had problems in the areas of spelling,
listening, verbal expression, and concentration in
lessons, while the equivalent figures for school B
stood at between 5 and 15 percent.
In 2015, the difference between the two schools
was less pronounced. Notably, the proportion of
children who struggled to follow instructions fell
by 24% in school A, and this school also saw falls of 22%, 15%, 14%, and 5% in the figures for
children who had problems with concentration,
listening, verbal expression, and spelling. In school
B, however, the proportion of children who
struggled with spelling and following
instructions doubled, to 10% and 12%
respectively, and there was almost no change in
the incidence of listening, verbal, or concentration
problems.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12629051706 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3908960956 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 3.83414634146 782% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294352991302 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153458996021 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719719545331 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798902951402 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096999121133 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.