The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937, 1967 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below presents the data about the enrolment of students at Manchester United in 1937, 1967 and 2017. This essay illustrates key observations of the given figure.
Overall, the quantity of students enrolled that went up considerably from 327 to 6254 students over the course of 80 years (between 1937 and 2017). The proportion of students in term of female and overseas experienced remarkably while there is a strong decline in those about male and locality.
As can be seen from this table, the ratio of female and male students commenced, being 45% and 55% respectively in the first stage of the period (1937). Featuring a notable change, the percentage of male students transformed the last position with those female students (45% versus 55%).
It is surprising to note that British students started the any given years with 55% (1937) then it decreased gradually to the end of the given period with 1-2, which constituted for the lowest proportion in the percentage of students in Manchester United. To those students who came from abroad remained unchanged from 6% to 7% between 1937 and 1967 but rose dramatically to 32% over the period of 80 years from 1937 to 2017. As a noteworthy observation, the figure for locality plunged and reached at the bottom with 1-2% while those international students grew significantly to 32% at the end of the given period
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-06 | Joel James | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-31 | vdrobny | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | vannhi0501 | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-31 | Harry1804 | 42 | view |
| 2020-03-31 | Harry1804 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories 78
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96536796537 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74414488333 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9755495773 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211888260061 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106313673368 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108578444349 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156448394214 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806353413843 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.