The table provides data on the underground railway of six different nations with respect to the year it was opened, kilometres of route and number of passengers travelling in millions each year.
Overall, London underground rail is the oldest and has the longest route, whereas underground rail of Los Angeles and Kyoto is the newest and has the shortest route respectively. Furthermore, while Tokyo appears to be the busiest underground rail, Kyoto has least number of passengers.
The London's underground railway was opened in 1863 and now carries 775 million commuters per year over 394 kilometres of distance. In 1900, underground railway was built in Paris with 199 kilometres of existing route accommodating 1191 million travellers, which is second highest among all. Following this and underground railway network of 155 kilometres were built in Tokyo in 1927. This is used by 1927 million people each year making it the most used underground railway.
On the other hand, after 50 years the Washington DC inaugurated its underground rail in 1981 which has 126 kilometres of track and is used by 144 million passengers each year. Kyoto and Los Angeles underground railway system were opened later in 1981 and 2001 respectively, with annual passengers numbering at and below 50 millions respectively.
- Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 73
- UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
... be the busiest underground rail, Kyoto has least number of passengers. The Londons un...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, whereas, while, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29186602871 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90479883575 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4515324646 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127763003355 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636163467933 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270153583148 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834412960701 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204870482567 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.