The given table compares the underground railway systems in 6 big cities by three categories including the opening date, the length of route and the total passenger per year.
Overall, the railway systems in London have been publicized earlier and also have had longer routes than 5 other cities. However, Tokyo's systems have welcomed the highest passenger rate per year although they have shorter routes. Additionally, the underground railway systems were opened at the latest in Los Angeles but Kyoto's systems had the lowest length of route as well as the number of passengers.
The earliest railways systems were accessible in London in 1863 with 394 km in length, which welcome about 775 million passengers per year. Opening in 1900, the railway systems in Paris consisted of 199 km length of the route and 1191 million passengers per year. Tokyo's systems publicized in the next 27 years with fewer kilometres )155) in length but a higher number of commuters (1927).
The 3 underground railways systems in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles gradually opened in 1979, 1981 and 2001 with 126 km, 11 km and 28 km in length. These three systems welcomed 144, 45 and 50 million customers per year respectively and the lowest figure was nearly 40 times lower than the highest one
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children while other think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51844896339 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7503900387 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179131508121 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911980521854 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599555794132 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133568377434 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450392428864 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97674418605 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51844896339 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7503900387 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179131508121 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911980521854 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599555794132 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133568377434 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450392428864 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.