The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The given table compares consumption of various categories including refreshment, clothes, recreational and educational activities in Ireland, Italy, Spain and Turkey in 2002.
Overall, food, drink and tobacco accounted for the lion’s share in expenditures of the surveyed people in all five countries. The opposite allocation, however, was found in the group of leisure and education.
As can be seen from the table, the most money spent on sort of food, drinks and tobacco was in Turkey, with the proportion of 32,14%, followed by 28,91% from Ireland. There was not much discrepancy in expenses of this sort in the three remaining countries, which varied between 15,77% and 18,8%.
For clothing and footwear, the Italian spent the most with the percentage of 9%. People from Ireland, Spain and Turkey consumed approximately 6,5% of their budget, while the figure for the Swedish was about 1% lower. Significant differences could not be seen in spending on leisure and education in these countries with the marginal amount of money ranging from 1,98% to 4,35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32352941176 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76438671499 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6189585651 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972060599791 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036571690893 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491666642763 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536875896971 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432314516064 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.