The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table indicates the percentage of various features which buyer in five different regions spending on in 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that food, drinks and tobacco products has the percentage of buyer which was higher than others. Besides, people in Europe seem like less buy some items about leisure and education. Getting back to the details, the proportion of food, drinks and tobacco was around 20%. Five nations' spend on this category was quite large. Turkey people tend to shop in daily products was most with 32. 14%, which was higher than the data in Iceland was nearly 5%. In addition, the percentage of Italy consumer buying food, drinks and tobacco was 16. 36%, which was higher than the lowest data from Sweden with 15. 77% and lower than 18. 80% in Spain.
Furthermore, citizens in nations spend on clothing and footwear was not as much as food, drinks and tobacco. People in Italy buy cloths and footwear prevented 9%, which was the largest percentage. There was the consumer shopped clothing figure in regions respectively Turkey with 6. 63%, Spain percent 6. 51%, Ireland with 6. 43% and the lowest was Sweden with 5. 40%.
Finally, in the leisure and education which items people less buying, the most proportion in Turkey was 4. 35% which was higher than Sweden and Italy accordingly. The Ireland percentage was 2. 21% and Spain consumer percent just 1, 98% were last figures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | KayVu | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, finally, furthermore, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84647302905 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29316845875 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 8.94146341463 235% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7335148311 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 55.619047619 112.824112599 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4761904762 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.09268292683 367% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0679495408351 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242208843909 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524114451752 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818349710688 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918842266891 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.67 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.