The given data represents the amount of money spent by consumers in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in three categories in the year 2002. As presented in the table data, people of those countries spent more on foods and tobaccos than they did for dresses, education and entertainment.
According to the given data, Turkish people spent the highest percentage of food and tobaccos amounting one-third of their total expenses on consumer products. Irish people spent more than 28% on this category while people of Italy, Spain and Sweden spent just over 15% for food and tobaccos. For clothing and footwear, the people of these five countries spent around 5% to 9% of which Italian spent the highest percentage (9%).
Interestingly, the expenditure in leisure activities and education was much less than the amount spent on food, tobacco and dresses. The highest amount spent on education and entertainment was done by Turkish people (4.35%) and the least amount spent by the Spanish (1.98%).
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that a higher salary is the key to job satisfaction while others argue that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 56
- Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development because this land would be better used for h 89
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13496932515 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60108229717 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 9.3764794751 43.030603864 22% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0408014066302 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255784499042 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239457874759 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0340148967797 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285263158516 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.