The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The shown table illustrates the statistics about consumer expenses on several products in five nations in 2002, measured in percentage.
Generally speaking, all countries surveyed tended to spend the most on food, beverage, and tobacco, and purchase the least amount of money on leisure and education. Clothing and footwear section was in the middle of the three categories with the rate of spending ranging from 5,40% to 9%.
Turkey outstripped any other country in terms of food, beverage, and tobacco trading and recreational and educational spending, with more than 32% and 4% respectively. This country also placed second place in the expense of clothing and footwear, while Italy topped the list in this section with sharply 9%. However, the amount this country spent on eating and drinking, and learning and entertaining only took the fourth and third places respectively, with nearly 17% and 3,2%.
Ireland was the country spending the second-largest amount on foodstuff (28,91%), while this nation’s expenditure on wearing and leisure and education both took fourth place (6,43% and 2,21%). Spain had the third position in expenditures on foodstuff and clothing and shoes (18,80% and 6,51%) but spent the least on amusement and education (1,98%). Sweden got second place in recreational and educational spending (4,35%) when expensing the lowest amount on eating, drinking, and wearing, with 15,77% and 5,40% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-25 MiaMia_8786 56 view
2022-08-23 Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan 73 view
2022-07-28 Hanabi 11 view
2022-07-28 Hanabi 11 view
2021-12-30 KayVu 84 view
Essays by user Nguyen Thi Tha… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of spending ranging from 5,40% to 9%. Turkey outstripped any other country in ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 6.8 368% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42792792793 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77482230567 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1739350232 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0786693558397 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371077654795 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319350142752 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612548900513 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344884204453 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.