The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table illustrated the proportion of five countries’ expenditure on divergent products. Data recorded in 2002, which involved Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey.
Apparently, the spending percentages descended from left to right. Food/Drinks and Tobacco took the highest amount of national consuming in every countries, Italy had the smallest spending amount in this group of 16.36%. 16.36% of Italian consuming for principal needs were still 1.5 times larger than the highest data in fashion spending. The “Leisure/Education” consuming group consumed the lowest spending of every residents, for the index varied only between 1.98% and 4.35%
Turkey’s residents were reported to spend much more than the rest in the first category, with 32.14% of disbursement for basic human demands. On the other hand, Italy, appeared to be an economical nation for those items in first group with the least amount, seemed to lavished the largest proportion on clothes and footwear. The data measured was 9.00% and approximatedly 1.7 times higher than Sweden’s, the countries shared the lowest index in this group. It is reasonable to such kingdom of fashion. For the last category, Turkey once again pioneered in the spending for study as well as leisure. The spending for personal evolution in Turkey was 4.35% and even 1.17% higher than the consumed quantities in Sweden – the nation belong to Scandivania, an areabest known for the its human development.
According to the table, though the need of each country’s residents varied, there was a transparent trend that the need of fundamental items took the largest proportion, then fashion demands and finally anthropotic expenditure. Turkey was the most generous nations for having the biggest percentages in the first and last group expenditure.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount ofsupport they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 78
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of thepopulation between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecompari 78
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and materialpossessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seemimportant.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this case?What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children? 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...g to Scandivania, an areabest known for the its human development. According to the t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, first, so, still, then, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51957295374 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19932586205 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572953736655 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.257089014 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.307692308 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929128390647 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356662752469 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256663858042 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628634816426 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226919531812 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.