The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

The table shows the proportion of products that people consume in the year 2002 in five European countries. It can be seen that the necessary products as food, drinks and tobacco are absorbed much more percentage than others.

The most noticeable proportion related to food/drinks/tobacco with the highest percentage in Turkey over 30 percent and the lowest nation was Sweden having 15.77% of consuming on this product range. The percentage of the rest three countries Italy, Spain and Ireland came from a lower amount than two others in 16.36%, 18.8% and 28.91% respectively. While the food/drinks and tobacco had significant numbers of the consumer in five countries, leisure and education indicated the lowest figure of people used this product class. Spanish population absorbed only 1.98%. The most amount in this product category belonged to Turkey at 4.35 %.

Closing and footwear products showed the middle rate in demand. Italy is a country had the highest number of population expanded 9% on this item. In contrast, there were only 5.4% of consumers from Sweden for this product category.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-30 Ahmad_off 84 view
2023-08-07 .zin@ 78 view
2023-06-25 MiaMia_8786 56 view
2023-04-18 minthu vũ view
2023-04-13 anhminhbnvn1 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73921005567 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1834321698 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105448953967 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461602945739 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584768337657 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842296414382 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025113887866 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.