The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The consumption on different necessities in five European countries in the year 2002 was depicted in the diagram. Overall, all five countries saw the highest expenditure in food, drinks and tobacco, while leisure and education accounted for the lowest figure of all three sectors.
Regarding food, drinks and tobacco, Turkey consumed 32, 14% of spending on this, twice as much as the same field of Sweden. Ireland spent 28.91% of their budget on food, tobacco and drinks, while Italy and Spain possessed a figure of 16.36% and 18.8% respectively.
In terms of Clothing and footwear, Italy’s level of expenditure on this item is 9%, three over twos larger than Sweden’s. On the other hand, Ireland, Spain, Turkey almost shared the same figure.
As can be seen, Turkey accounted for the highest budget spent on leisure and education while Spain saw the lowest consumption. No nation among the given spent more than 5% of their budget on this sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The bar chart gives information about the percentage of workers in different sectors of employment in three countries at different stages of economic development 70
- Summarizing the process 11
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The bar chart gives information about the percentage of workers in different sectors of employment in three countries at different stages of economic development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09493670886 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63699324536 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4743002461 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119035777923 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535773229375 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082782008071 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665658933096 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747104010861 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.