The table below information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

In 2002,The table shows the information on consumer that spends on several items in different nations.

It is clear that overall, mentioned five countries percentage of National consumer expenditure on food/drinks /tobacco showed the majority ratio whereas leisure /education experienced lower proportion.

On the food,drinks and tobacco, percentage of national consumers expenditure by only one non european countrie Turkey war the highest position with the figure of 32.14% while Ireland experienced second location by 28.91%.
However. Italy and Sweden showed almost same figure by 16.36% and 15.77% respectively as well as spain showed one of the majority by 18.8%.

On the other hand, by clothing/footwear Italy took place the majorship by 9.00% and Ireland, spain and Turkey were smaller proportion at 6.43%,6.51% and 6.63% and the Sweden saw only at 5.4%.

On the one hand, on leisure and education Turkey experienced summit ratio:4.35% when spain was the lowest figure: only 1.9%.Ireland, Italy and sweden consumed by 2.21%,3.20% and 3.22% gradually.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-30 Ahmad_off 84 view
2023-08-07 .zin@ 78 view
2023-06-25 MiaMia_8786 56 view
2023-04-18 minthu vũ view
2023-04-13 anhminhbnvn1 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drinks
...ienced lower proportion. On the food,drinks and tobacco, percentage of national con...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...nks and tobacco, percentage of national consumers expenditure by only one non european co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...experienced second location by 28.91%. However. Italy and Sweden showed almost same fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proportion at 6.43%,6.51% and 6.63% and the Sweden saw only at 5.4%. On the o...
^^
Line 10, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Ireland
... spain was the lowest figure: only 1.9%.Ireland, Italy and sweden consumed by 2.21%,3.2...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7125 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99037518549 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.385794266 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.333333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184017960642 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118007659664 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18283651643 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118007659664 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18283651643 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.