The table data provides information about the various books namely fiction, non fiction and magazines had taken by non -book club members and club members in Feb 1998. Overall the people are broadly classified as non -book club members and club members depending on their membership. Non -book club members consists of public, college staff and students.
A glance at the table depicts the fact that the public had taken only 122 fiction and 82 magazines and had not taken a single fiction book, in contrast college staff and students had taken 44 and 31 respectively. Lots of magazines from bookshop around 1249 , had taken by students and on the other hand they are the one who took more number of non fiction books. Staff took around 332 magazines and 29 non - fictions.
Book club members took lots of non - fiction books of about 942, fiction and magazine stood next in the list with 76 and 33 respectively.
To Recapitulate, approximately thrice the number of book club members had taken by non book club members. Interstingly more than half of the books taken is by college students , that too magazines stood in prior.
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 84
- RE-WRITE: The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002 56
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 14
- The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he table data provides information about the various books namely fiction, non fi...
^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their membership. Non -book club members consists of public, college staff and st...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly 122 fiction and 82 magazines and had not taken a single fiction book, in cont...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s of magazines from bookshop around 1249 , had taken by students and on the other ...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n books. Staff took around 332 magazines and 29 non - fictions. Book club member...
^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 33 respectively. To Recapitulate, approximately thrice the number of book ...
^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f the books taken is by college students , that too magazines stood in prior.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86528497409 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52391994076 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497409326425 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8841805494 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0395763036503 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021622923272 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214488285549 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0245395536075 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168528752367 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.