The data in the table depicts the information about five countries consumer expenditure on various products in 2002.
As it is evident from data in the table all the five countries was spending more on food/drinks/tobacco, in contrast very less for leisure/Education. Turkey expenditure is more on food/drinks/tobacco of about 32.14%, Ireland took the second position with 28.91% an then Spain with 18.80%. Sweden and Italy spent approximately same amount on food/drinks/tobacco. in opposite, Italy expenditure in food/drinks/tobacco is less, while more in clothing/Footwear. Sweden spent around 5.40%, meanwhile Turkey, Spain and Ireland spent just above 6.40%. Of all Expenditures, Education/Leisure had least attracted in all five countries. Turkey spent 4.35%, Sweden and Italy is down in the list with 3.22% and 3.20% respectively. The lowest expenditure spent is by Spain of about 1.98 on Education/Leisure, only 3% more is done by Ireland.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002 56
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 52
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph shows estimated sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of Dirhams. 67
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The data in the table depicts the information about five countries con...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nd took the second position with 28.91% an then Spain with 18.80%. Sweden and Ital...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: AN_THEN[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'and then'?
Suggestion: and then
...nd took the second position with 28.91% an then Spain with 18.80%. Sweden and Italy spe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Italy spent approximately same amount on food/drinks/tobacco. in opposite, Italy ...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ly same amount on food/drinks/tobacco. in opposite, Italy expenditure in food/dri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68531468531 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.07263265471 2.65546596893 153% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58041958042 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5809320861 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132275798614 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657379700115 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112368251971 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214899373921 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156854303279 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.