The table below show worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacture in the years 2004,2006 and 2014.
The table illustrates total market share of eight computer production companies around the globe during three distinctive years of 2006, 2007 and 2014. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, The highest market share holds with HP company and the lowest share with fujistu over the three given periods. Similarly, all companies except fujistu and others shows a systematic increase on total share of market in computer industry.
From the beginning, HP shared 31.4% market share which escalated do 34% in the next year and ends at 34.25% by 2014. Likewise, dell and Samsung exhibits 16.6% and 11.6% in 2006 which surge to 26.12% and 14.20% respectively at the end of the given period.
Regarding Toshiba and lenova has minimal market share compared to former companies such as just over 6% in the starting and slight improvement on the following years and ends with 8.12% and 7.10% each. Moreover, fujistu start their share at 4.8% which decline to 3.1%, and others shared 22.8% in 2006 and dropped to 7.11% by 2014.
- Many people believe that schools should teach children to become good citizens and workers rather than independent individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and relevant examples. 84
- Online people write opinions and reviews of services Is it a good thing or bad thing 70
- Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the the reasons? Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilarly, all companies except fujistu and others shows a systematic increase on to...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 8.12% and 7.10% each. Moreover, fujistu start their share at 4.8% which decline ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, regarding, similarly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38127063287 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5545634808 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314486160411 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138618226028 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907565299706 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203707135185 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470853005691 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.